Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 11. Num. 3.July - September 2018
Pages 133-200
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
326
Vol. 11. Num. 3.July - September 2018
Pages 133-200
Letter to the Editor
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.11.001
Central corneal thickness measurement with Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P
Medición del espesor corneal central con Cirrus HD-OCT y Topcon SP - 3000P
Visits
326
Maddalena De Bernardo
Corresponding author
mdebernardo@unisa.it

Corresponding author at: Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via Salvador Allende, 84081 Baronissi (SA), Italy.
, Francesco Antonio Salzano, Nicola Rosa
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy
Related content
J Optom.2018;11:192-710.1016/j.optom.2016.12.004
Jorge A. Calvo-Sanz, Javier Ruiz-Alcocer, Miguel A. Sánchez-Tena
J Optom.2018;11:19910.1016/j.optom.2017.11.002
Jorge A. Calvo-Sanz
This item has received
326
Visits
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Dear Editor,
Full Text

We read with great interest the article by Calvo-Sanz et al. comparing specular microscopy (SM) with OCT and ultrasound pachymetry (USP).1

We would like to congratulate with the authors for their excellent paper, because even if corneal thickness (CT) is not the only parameter involved in the reliability of intraocular pressure measurement,2 a precise CT measurement is very important both in establishing the corneal health3 and in evaluating the intraocular pressure.4

Their paper confirms our belief that SM measurements are in absolute thinner compared to other devices.5,6

In fact in a previous paper De Bernardo et al. found that CT obtained with this device was thinner than the measurements obtained with Pentacam, and they proposed a regression formula to make the measurements comparable.7

We agree with the authors that USP measurements depend on the exact axial placement of the probe making the reproducibility of measurements dependent on examiner expertise.8

Concerning the difference between USP and SM, the authors performed the USP after the instillation of topical anesthesia utilizing a combination of 0.1% tetracaine and 0.4% oxybuprocaine.

Theoretically this could have given some differences, because it is true that in a previous published paper it has been demonstrated no influence on CT and volume measurements with the instillation of oxybuprocaine eye drops,9 but tetracaine eye drops have been described to cause corneal thickening.10

So in conclusion we would like to suggest that for future works concerning the comparison of different devices the use of oxybuprocaine, better if preservative free, instead of tetracaine should be advisable.

Funding

None.

References
[1]
J.A. Calvo-Sanz,J. Ruiz-Alcocer,M.A. Sánchez-Tena
Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness
[2]
N. Rosa,M. Lanza,M. Borrelli,A. Palladino,M.G. Di Gregorio,L. Politano
Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties in patients with myotonic dystrophy
Ophthalmology, 116 (2009), pp. 231-234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.001
[3]
N. Rosa,M. Lanza,M. Borrelli
Corneal thickness and endothelial cell characteristics in patients with myotonic dystrophy
Ophthalmology, 117 (2010), pp. 223-225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.003
[4]
M. Lanza,M. Borrelli,M. De Bernardo,M.L. Filosa,N. Rosa
Corneal parameters and difference between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes
[5]
M. De Bernardo,N. Rosa
Comparison of specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and after cataract surgery
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 255 (2017), pp. 837-838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3604-2
[6]
M. De Bernardo,N. Rosa
Central corneal thickness after cross-linking using high-definition optical coherence tomography ultrasound, and dual Scheimpflug tomography: a comparative study over one year
Am J Ophthalmol, 176 (2017), pp. 254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.01.005
[7]
M. De Bernardo,M. Borrelli,M. Mariniello,M. Lanza,N. Rosa
Pentacam vs SP3000P specular microscopy in measuring corneal thickness
Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 38 (2015), pp. 21-27 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2014.08.006
[8]
N. Rosa,M. De Bernardo
Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 255 (2017), pp. 1251-1252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3634-9
[9]
N. Rosa,M. De Bernardo,M. Borrelli,M.L. Filosa,M. Lanza
Effect of oxybuprocaine eye drops on corneal volume and thickness measurements
Optom Vis Sci, 88 (2011), pp. 640-644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182114303
[10]
U.L. Osuagwu,K.C. Ogbuehi
Evaluation of the comparative effect of tetracaine on central corneal thickness measured by a contact and noncontact pachymeter
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 29 (2013), pp. 68-74 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2011.0242
Copyright © 2018. Spanish General Council of Optometry
Journal of Optometry

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Article options
Tools
Cookies policy
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?