Advanced Search
Share
Latest issue
Journal Information
Back to article

Statistics

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

Original Article
Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction
Comparación de la evaluación refractiva mediante aberrometría por frente de onda, autorefractómetro y refracción subjetiva
Jeffrey R. Bennetta,
, Gina M. Stalboergera, David O. Hodgeb, Muriel M. Schornacka
a Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic1, Rochester, MN, United States
b Biostatistics Unit, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
Read
15378
Times
was read the article
4859
Total PDF
10519
Total HTML
Share statistics
Article information
ISSN: 18884296
Original language: English
DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2014.11.001
The statistics are updated each day
Year/Month Html Pdf Total
2025 10 168 52 220
2025 9 143 57 200
2025 8 75 52 127
2025 7 77 46 123
2025 6 80 33 113
2025 5 100 71 171
2025 4 105 57 162
2025 3 88 52 140
2025 2 82 67 149
2025 1 56 64 120
2024 12 64 74 138
2024 11 68 50 118
2024 10 56 57 113
2024 9 66 51 117
2024 8 57 54 111
2024 7 40 40 80
2024 6 57 51 108
2024 5 43 57 100
2024 4 41 58 99
2024 3 41 47 88
2024 2 42 71 113
2024 1 33 67 100
2023 12 32 66 98
2023 11 43 79 122
2023 10 38 77 115
2023 9 32 69 101
2023 8 19 56 75
2023 7 20 54 74
2023 6 24 59 83
2023 5 47 63 110
2023 4 29 54 83
2023 3 38 54 92
2023 2 27 62 89
2023 1 29 63 92
2022 12 55 70 125
2022 11 48 55 103
2022 10 54 46 100
2022 9 37 49 86
2022 8 37 36 73
2022 7 32 44 76
2022 6 25 33 58
2022 5 38 29 67
2022 4 86 37 123
2022 3 34 39 73
2022 2 27 36 63
2022 1 43 38 81
2021 12 24 37 61
2021 11 35 54 89
2021 10 81 54 135
2021 9 45 33 78
2021 8 35 35 70
2021 7 32 29 61
2021 6 14 27 41
2021 5 36 59 95
2021 4 377 85 462
2021 3 78 38 116
2021 2 34 20 54
2021 1 41 41 82
2020 12 29 32 61
2020 11 51 29 80
2020 10 39 32 71
2020 9 43 50 93
2020 8 56 31 87
2020 7 55 36 91
2020 6 31 24 55
2020 5 62 36 98
2020 4 49 35 84
2020 3 34 20 54
2020 2 48 27 75
2020 1 55 29 84
2019 12 47 25 72
2019 11 62 36 98
2019 10 44 41 85
2019 9 67 27 94
2019 8 54 32 86
2019 7 69 33 102
2019 6 58 34 92
2019 5 67 20 87
2019 4 377 29 406
2019 3 60 32 92
2019 2 66 28 94
2019 1 61 40 101
2018 12 61 42 103
2018 11 86 34 120
2018 10 76 32 108
2018 9 38 29 67
2018 7 1 0 1
2018 6 1 1 2
2018 5 38 14 52
2018 4 65 12 77
2018 3 63 22 85
2018 2 51 10 61
2018 1 53 14 67
2017 12 53 12 65
2017 11 50 11 61
2017 10 54 11 65
2017 9 72 41 113
2017 8 65 41 106
2017 7 66 38 104
2017 6 83 34 117
2017 5 77 36 113
2017 4 177 94 271
2017 3 100 41 141
2017 2 77 26 103
2017 1 60 14 74
2016 12 105 37 142
2016 11 137 30 167
2016 10 155 27 182
2016 9 282 43 325
2016 8 282 52 334
2016 7 262 47 309
2016 6 150 0 150
2016 5 172 0 172
2016 4 171 0 171
2016 3 192 0 192
2016 2 183 0 183
2016 1 169 0 169
2015 12 171 0 171
2015 11 141 0 141
2015 10 119 0 119
2015 9 132 0 132
2015 8 153 29 182
2015 7 190 15 205
2015 6 370 70 440
2015 5 605 131 736
2015 4 19 3 22
Show all

Follow this link to access the full text of the article

Subscribe to our newsletter

Publish in
Journal of Optometry
cope-logo
Journal of Optometry is a member and subscribes the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
www.publicationethics.org.
Journal of Optometry